Editorial policy

This policy describes how content on AudifortRevise is produced, graded, dated and corrected. It is written to be checked: if any page does something this document forbids, the <a href="/contact/">contact page</a> explains how to report it.

Serving size, declared amounts, ingredient names as printed, excipients, directions, the structure/function claim, the manufacturing statement, package contents, prices, bonuses and guarantee conditions are transcribed from the manufacturer’s own website, order page, policy pages and Supplement Facts panel. They are never taken from a retailer listing, a review site or a forum post.

Where the manufacturer’s own sources conflict with one another, both versions are printed and the conflict is flagged rather than resolved silently. The bottle label governs a packaged product; the website is a secondary source.

Each substantive statement on a product page is assigned one of four grades, and the grade is presented rather than buried in wording. The mapping below is the rule the desk applies.

The distinction the grades enforce most strictly: research on an ingredient is not research on the product. Grape seed extract having antioxidant activity does not make a proprietary blend effective, and no page here lets that leap pass unspoken.

• Review averages, review counts and customer-satisfaction figures printed by the manufacturer are reported as manufacturer-reported, with the fact that this site did not host, moderate or verify them stated alongside.

• Testimonials, case studies and before-and-after material are never reproduced as evidence of efficacy.

• A manufacturer claim about timing — for example, how quickly results are expected — is reported as the manufacturer’s statement, not as a finding.

• Unnamed competitor comparisons are described as unevaluable rather than repeated as fact.

• Manufacturer-supplied imagery is captioned as manufacturer marketing artwork, never as an independent photograph.

1. No fabricated reviews, ratings, testimonials, customer quotes or survey results.

2. No claim that any clinician has reviewed or approved the content, because none has.

3. No medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendation or dosing instruction beyond the label.

4. No invented facts to fill a gap: no made-up addresses, certifications, guarantees or jurisdictions.

5. No page published as finished work when the reporting is incomplete.

Every product fact currently published on this site was read from the manufacturer’s own pages on 25 September 2026, and that is the verification date shown on the pages. A date stamp means the underlying source was read on that day; it does not mean nothing has changed since. Prices, packages, bonuses and guarantee terms are therefore always re-confirmed on the official order page, and the manufacturer’s current terms govern any purchase.

A last-updated date reflects an editorial change; a pricing-checked date reflects a re-read of commercial terms. They are tracked separately, because a sentence can be rewritten without a price moving.

AudifortRevise is funded by affiliate commission and nothing else. No one pays for coverage, a rating, a placement or a change of conclusion, and the manufacturer has no editorial access, no approval step and no right of preview. Affiliate links appear on the pages that discuss the product, and they also appear on the hearing-health guides, which are funded by the same commission and say so in the note beside each button.

The site earns most when readers buy. It has therefore published a negative conclusion about a product it links to, and it would do so again. Full mechanics are in the <a href="/affiliate-disclosure/">affiliate disclosure</a>.

A factual error, a broken source, an overstatement or an unattributed claim is corrected on the page itself, with the date of the correction and a description of what changed. Corrections are not silent, and a correction that changes a conclusion changes the conclusion. Disputes about a source are settled by reading the source. If you show that a statement is inaccurate and supply the primary source, the page is corrected.

• A change to the Supplement Facts panel, the ingredient list, the serving size or the directions.

• A change to packages, prices, bonuses, shipping or guarantee conditions on the official order page.

• A new clinical trial of the finished product, or its continued absence.

• A new systematic review, meta-analysis or guideline relevant to a claim on the page.

• A change to the manufacturer’s published policies — returns, shipping, affiliate terms or the disclaimer.

• A credible report of a safety signal, adverse event or regulatory action.

• A substantiated reader correction or source dispute, raised through the <a href="/contact/">contact page</a>.

Published 25 Sept 2026Last updated 25 Sept 2026